1. Quality Scoring Scale
| Score Range | Category | Recommended Use Case |
| 14-17 | Excellent | Shows, breeding documentation, advertising |
| 10-13 | Good | Kennel websites, social media, catalogs |
| 6-9 | Average | Personal archives, reference materials |
| 0-5 | Poor | Not suitable for evaluation purposes |
2. Category-Specific Characteristics
Excellent (14-17 points)
- Fur Texture:
- Clear separation of guard hairs and undercoat (
glcm_contrast > 150) - Visible “fluffiness” and volume (
image_entropy > 0.9)
- Clear separation of guard hairs and undercoat (
- Sharpness:
- Crisp hair definition (
variance_of_laplacian > 1500) - No visible halos or oversharpening (
tenengrad < 30,000)
- Crisp hair definition (
- Compression:
- Minimal blocking artifacts (
blockiness < 5) - No noticeable blur (
jnb < 0.2)
- Minimal blocking artifacts (
Good (10-13 points)
- Fur Texture:
- Partial undercoat visibility (
glcm_contrast 100-150) - Moderate texture complexity (
image_entropy 0.8-0.9)
- Partial undercoat visibility (
- Sharpness:
- Slight softness in detailed areas (
variance_of_laplacian 500-1500)
- Slight softness in detailed areas (
- Compression:
- Minor 8×8 pixel blocks in backgrounds (
blockiness 5-10) - Localized blur in complex patterns (
jnb 0.2-0.3)
- Minor 8×8 pixel blocks in backgrounds (
Average (6-9 points)
- Fur Texture:
- “Plastic” appearance without volume (
glcm_contrast 50-100) - Significant texture loss (
image_entropy 0.7-0.8)
- “Plastic” appearance without volume (
- Sharpness:
- Visible softness throughout (
variance_of_laplacian 100-500)
- Visible softness throughout (
- Compression:
- Noticeable 8×8 pixel blocks (
blockiness 10-20) - “Soapy” effect in fur (
jnb 0.3-0.4)
- Noticeable 8×8 pixel blocks (
Poor (0-5 points)
- Fur Texture:
- Homogeneous mass without definition (
glcm_contrast < 50) - Complete texture loss (
image_entropy < 0.7)
- Homogeneous mass without definition (
- Sharpness:
- Severe blurring (
variance_of_laplacian < 100)
- Severe blurring (
- Compression:
- Dominant 16×16+ pixel blocks (
blockiness > 20) - “Watercolor” artifacts (
jnb > 0.4)
- Dominant 16×16+ pixel blocks (
3. Critical Parameters for Spitz Evaluation
| Parameter | Excellent | Poor | Impact Weight |
| Blockiness | <5 | >20 | 25% |
| GLCM Contrast | >150 | <50 | 30% |
| Variance of Laplacian | >1500 | <100 | 20% |
| JNB | <0.2 | >0.4 | 15% |
| Image Entropy | >0.9 | <0.7 | 10% |
4. Case Studies
High-Quality Example (16 pts – Excellent)
File from training set

Key metrics:json
"blockiness": 3.4, "variance_of_laplacian": 22.3, // Optimal for balanced quality "jnb": 0.18
Visual: Perfect “powder-puff” texture with individual hair visibility
Low-Quality Example (2 pts – Poor)
File from training set

Key metrics:
"blockiness": 40.0, // Critical compression artifacts "glcm_contrast": 859.7 // Indicates oversharpening
Visual: Artificial texture with blocking artifacts